Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Infect Dis Ther ; 12(3): 891-917, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2282187

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ceftazidime-avibactam has proven activity against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria in clinical trials and real-world studies. This study was conducted to describe the patterns of use of ceftazidime-avibactam (including indications and associated antibiotics), and the effectiveness and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: This non-interventional medical chart review study was conducted in 11 countries across the European and Latin American (LATAM) regions. Consecutive patients treated in clinical practice with at least one dose of ceftazidime-avibactam for an approved indication per country label since 01 January 2018 (or launch date in the country if posterior) were enrolled. Effectiveness analyses were conducted in patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 h. RESULTS: Of the 569 eligible patients enrolled, 516 (90.7%) were treated for at least 72 h (354 patients from Europe and 162 patients from LATAM); 390 patients (75.7%) had switched from another antibiotic line for Gram-negative coverage. Infection sources were intra-abdominal, urinary, respiratory, bloodstream infections, and other infections (approximately 20% each). K. pneumoniae was the most common microorganism identified in the latest microbiological evaluation before starting ceftazidime-avibactam (59.3%). Two-thirds of microorganisms tested for susceptibility were MDR, of which 89.3% were carbapenem-resistant. The common MDR mechanisms for K. pneumoniae were carbapenemase (33.9%), oxacillinase 48 (25.2%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (21.5%), or metallo-beta-lactamase (14.2%) production. Without prior patient exposure, 17 isolates (mostly K. pneumoniae) were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. Treatment success was achieved in 77.3% of patients overall (88.3% among patients with urinary infection), regardless of first or second treatment line. In-hospital mortality rate was 23.1%. Adverse events were reported for six of the 569 patients enrolled. CONCLUSION: This study provides important real-world evidence on treatment patterns, effectiveness, and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam in clinical practice through its recruitment in the European and LATAM regions. Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the antibiotics to consider for treatment of MDR bacteria. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03923426.

2.
Cureus ; 15(1): e33826, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280440

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Depression is among the most common mental disorders which is a leading cause of disability and is a negative prognostic indicator in many non-communicable chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN). Depression among these patients can further worsen their disease condition. Existing information on this topic has mostly come from tertiary care hospital setting. Hence, present study was done among patients attending a primary health center (PHC) in New Delhi. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study conducted among 210 participants having diabetes and/or hypertension attending the non-communicable diseases (NCD) clinic at PHC, Fatehpur Beri, New Delhi. Simple random sampling was done and a pre-designed, semi-structured, interview-based questionnaire was used. Depression was assessed using a Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: The overall prevalence of depression was found to be 49% (n=103), out of which most had moderate depression (23.8%), 16.2% had moderately severe depression, and 9% had severe depression. Multivariate analysis results revealed the odds of having depression to be significantly higher among those who belonged to lower socioeconomic class (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=2.9, confidence interval, CI=1.2-7.4); had uncontrolled diabetes mellitus/hypertension (DM/HTN) (adjusted odds ratio, aOR=2.5, CI=1.1-6.1); had associated comorbidities (aOR=5.9, CI=2.4-15); sedentary lifestyle (aOR=7.8, CI=2.4-25.1); who had past history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (aOR=14.7, CI=5.4-39.6); and those who lost family member(s) due to COVID-19 (aOR=10.1, CI=1.3-79.4). CONCLUSION:  Prevalence of depression in patients with DM/HTN was found to be significantly high and various factors were found to be significant. Therefore, every such patient should be screened for depression; and periodic follow ups should also be conducted to prevent future complications and improve prognosis of the disease.

3.
3 Biotech ; 13(1): 36, 2023 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239817

ABSTRACT

In the last three years, COVID-19 has impacted the world with back-to-back waves leading to devastating consequences. SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, was first detected in 2019 and since then has spread to 228 countries. Even though the primary focus of research groups was diverted to fight against COVID-19, yet no dedicated drug has been developed to combat the emergent life-threatening medical conditions. In this study, 35 phytocompounds and 43 drugs were investigated for comparative docking analysis. Molecular docking and virtual screening were performed against SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein of 13 variants using AutoDock Vina tool 1.5.6 and Discovery Studio, respectively, to identify the most efficient drugs. Selection of the most suitable compounds with the best binding affinity was done after screening for toxicity, ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) properties and drug-likeliness. The potential candidates were discovered to be Liquiritin (binding affinities ranging between -7.0 and -8.1 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) and Apigenin (binding affinities ranging between -6.8 and -7.3 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) based on their toxicity and consistent binding affinity with the Spike protein of all variants. The stability of the protein-ligand complex was determined using Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of Apigenin with the Delta plus variant of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, Liquiritin and Apigenin were also found to be less toxic than the presently used drugs and showed promising results based on in silico studies, though, confirmation using in vitro studies is required. This in-depth comparative investigation suggests potential drug candidates to fight against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03450-6.

4.
3 Biotech ; 13(1), 2023.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-2167940

ABSTRACT

In the last three years, COVID-19 has impacted the world with back-to-back waves leading to devastating consequences. SARS-CoV-2, the causative agent of COVID-19, was first detected in 2019 and since then has spread to 228 countries. Even though the primary focus of research groups was diverted to fight against COVID-19, yet no dedicated drug has been developed to combat the emergent life-threatening medical conditions. In this study, 35 phytocompounds and 43 drugs were investigated for comparative docking analysis. Molecular docking and virtual screening were performed against SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein of 13 variants using AutoDock Vina tool 1.5.6 and Discovery Studio, respectively, to identify the most efficient drugs. Selection of the most suitable compounds with the best binding affinity was done after screening for toxicity, ADME (absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion) properties and drug-likeliness. The potential candidates were discovered to be Liquiritin (binding affinities ranging between −7.0 and −8.1 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) and Apigenin (binding affinities ranging between −6.8 and −7.3 kcal/mol for the 13 variants) based on their toxicity and consistent binding affinity with the Spike protein of all variants. The stability of the protein–ligand complex was determined using Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of Apigenin with the Delta plus variant of SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, Liquiritin and Apigenin were also found to be less toxic than the presently used drugs and showed promising results based on in silico studies, though, confirmation using in vitro studies is required. This in-depth comparative investigation suggests potential drug candidates to fight against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13205-022-03450-6.

6.
Pediatr Transplant ; 25(5): e13986, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1124666

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has proven to be a challenge in regard to the clinical presentation, prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection among children who are candidates for and recipients of SOT. By providing scenarios and frequently asked questions encountered in routine clinical practice, this document provides expert opinion and summarizes the available data regarding the prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection among pediatric SOT candidates and recipients and highlights ongoing knowledge gaps requiring further study. Currently available data are still lacking in the pediatric SOT population, but data have emerged in both the adult SOT and general pediatric population regarding the approach to COVID-19. The document provides expert opinion regarding prevention, diagnosis, and management of SARS-CoV-2 infection among pediatric SOT candidates and recipients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , End Stage Liver Disease/surgery , Liver Transplantation/adverse effects , Lung Transplantation/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplant Recipients , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , False Positive Reactions , Female , Humans , Immunocompromised Host , Male , Organ Transplantation , Pandemics , Patient Safety , Postoperative Period , Reproducibility of Results , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Risk , Risk Factors
7.
J Eval Clin Pract ; 26(6): 1592-1598, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-793758

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: The recent outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19) has infected around 1 560 000 individuals till 10 April 2020, which has resulted in 95 000 deaths globally. While no vaccine or anti-viral drugs for COVID-19 are available, lockdown acts as a protective public health measures to reduce human interaction and lower transmission. The study aims to explore the impact of delayed planning or lack of planning for the lockdown and inadequate implementation of the lockdown, on the transmission rate of COVID-19. METHOD: Epidemiological data on the incidence and mortality of COVID-19 cases as reported by public health authorities were accessed from six countries based on total number of infected cases, namely, United States and Italy (more than 100 000 cases); United Kingdom, and France (50 000-100 000 cases), and India and Russia (6000-10 000 cases). The Bayesian inferential technique was used to observe the changes (three points) in pattern of number of cases on different duration of exposure (in days) in these selected countries 1 month after World Health Organization (WHO) declaration about COVID-19 as a global pandemic. RESULTS: On comparing the pattern of transmission rates observed in these six countries at posterior estimated change points, it is found that partial implementation of lockdown (in the United States), delayed planning in lockdown (Russia, United Kingdom, and France), and inadequate implementation of the lockdown (in India and Italy) were responsible to the spread of infections. CONCLUSIONS: In order to control the spreading of COVID-19, like other national and international laws, lockdown must be implemented and enforced. It is suggested that on-time or adequate implementation of lockdown is a step towards social distancing and to control the spread of this pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Global Health/statistics & numerical data , Quarantine/standards , Social Isolation , Bayes Theorem , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Incidence , Models, Biological , Time Factors
8.
Liver Int ; 40(8): 1972-1976, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-436673

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by a novel coronavirus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) is driving a present day global pandemic. Immunosuppressed patients are regarded as a high-risk cohort. The following is a short report on COVID-19 in liver transplant recipients (n = 5) from a high volume UK liver transplant unit with a large follow-up cohort (n = 4500). Based on this limited data, liver transplant recipients appear to have a low incidence of COVID-19, with less severe symptoms than expected, when compared with the general population and other solid organ recipients. This possibly could be related to self-isolation adherence and/or the 'ideal' level of immunosuppression that favourably modulates the immune response to COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Liver Transplantation , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Prevalence , SARS-CoV-2
11.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233074, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-244944

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The outbreak of coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19), which started from Wuhan, China, in late 2019, have spread worldwide. A total of 5,91,971 cases and 2,70,90 deaths were registered till 28th March, 2020. We aimed to predict the impact of duration of exposure to COVID-19 on the mortality rates increment. METHODS: In the present study, data on COVID-19 infected top seven countries viz., Germany, China, France, United Kingdom, Iran, Italy and Spain, and World as a whole, were used for modeling. The analytical procedure of generalized linear model followed by Gompertz link function was used to predict the impact lethal duration of exposure on the mortality rates. FINDINGS: Of the selected countries and World as whole, the projection based on 21st March, 2020 cases, suggest that a total (95% Cl) of 76 (65-151) days of exposure in Germany, mortality rate will increase by 5 times to 1%. In countries like France and United Kingdom, our projection suggests that additional exposure of 48 days and 7 days, respectively, will raise the mortality rates to10%. Regarding Iran, Italy and Spain, mortality rate will rise to 10% with an additional 3-10 days of exposure. World's mortality rates will continue increase by 1% in every three weeks. The predicted interval of lethal duration corresponding to each country has found to be consistent with the mortality rates observed on 28th March, 2020. CONCLUSION: The prediction of lethal duration was found to have apparently effective in predicting mortality, and shows concordance with prevailing rates. In absence of any vaccine against COVID-19 infection, the present study adds information about the quantum of the severity and time elapsed to death will help the Government to take necessary and appropriate steps to control this pandemic.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections , Linear Models , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Global Health , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL